The health crisis is also a crisis of civilisation

1/ Health crisis and civil liberties

The coronavirus crisis will mark the history of the world in a number of ways. Perhaps less for the number of deaths that the pandemic will have caused than due to what it will have revealed about the unpreparedness of those in power, and the docility of those who were governed by it:

a/ The manipulation of public opinion: the government through fear and the liberticidal reign of the principle of precaution.

b/ The transformation of the common good in the name of hygienism and the ideology of health.

2/ The French bioethics law: a progressive bidding war

The “bioethics” bill, voted on second reading by the National Assembly during the night of 31 July to 1 August, is still under discussion. This text is an all-out attack on traditional medical ethics: increased commodification of the human embryo in the context of research and even authorisation to develop chimeric embryos; extension of the use of MAP to lesbian couples and single women. Surrogacy remains prohibited, for now As for Medical Interruption of Pregnancy (MIP), it is now possible up to the day before delivery, under conditions of “psycho-social” distress (sic). It is a legalization of thinly veiled infanticide.

3/ Increased secularism and the fighting against radical Islamism

Islamic terrorism is the radical side of the strengthening of socio-political Islam among Muslim populations coming from an immigrant background. In the name of the fight against these communitarian aberrations, now called ” separatists ” in France, the French government is preparing a toughening of secularism, at the expense of fundamental social and religious liberties: prohibition of home schooling, compulsory schooling at the age of 3, submission of public funding of religious associations to the signing of a charter of secularism.

4/ Spain: a cultural front of social transformation

In Spain, a cultural project for the radical transformation of society is forming a “Front” around the government. The aim is to place Spain at the forefront of the replacement of the European social order based on the dignity of the human being. This utter disorder cannot be overthrown by a political alternative, for lack of a cultural base capable of challenging this truly totalitarian relativist slide. This cultural overthrow, however, demands that we resist the most deconstructive political projects of this assault that has been unleashed by the “Front” formed around the government:

a/ To reject the draft law on euthanasia and propose an effective law on palliative care.
b/ To protect the freedom of education of families, guaranteeing absolute respect of their right to educate their children according to their own beliefs.
c/ To eliminate gender ideology from legislation and prevent the exploitation of women through surrogate motherhood.
d/ To strengthen the independence of the judiciary.
c/ To protect freedom of expression by repealing the Historical Memory Act.

5/ Portugal: destruction of history and language

Portugal is being subjected to a radical political agenda, aimed at subverting the cultural heritage of the Christian matrix of society, with the aim of legislatively imposing an atheistic or agnostic social model. Their targets are life, family and freedom. With minority demands such as those of homosexual, transgender and bisexual associations, at the centre of political life instead of the common good, history is rewritten, and a new language is imposed. Two legislative projects are directly attacking the dignity of the human being:

a/ Parliament has passed a law authorising post-mortem artificial insemination which is currently awaiting enactment;
b/ A permissive euthanasia law is under discussion, following the refusal to call a referendum on the subject, given the constitutional sanctity of human life and the categorical opposition of the Medical Association.

6/ Overview: state moralism and cultural offensive

European news is dominated by the Covid-19 pandemic and the management of the health crisis. While the measures do not follow the same strategies, they are accompanied in virtually all countries by the same moralistic rhetoric. State authorities want to establish an authoritarian health order, deciding which citizen behaviour is acceptable or not. The failure of health systems, who are unable to cope with an epidemic that affects a proportion of vulnerable people, whose death, when it comes, does not occur in unusual proportions (in France, 97% of those affected recover), is rarely called into question.

Behind leaders’ obsessions to protect their responsibility, questions are being raised about the emergence of a new “pan-medicalist” ideology (A. Comte-Sponville), illustrating our relationship to life and death, attributing all power to medicine, establishing health as the ultimate value « While we allow the most inviolable commandment – thou shalt not kill – to be eroded,” writes Pierre Manent, we put all our pride into trying to validate the craziest promise: thou shalt not die. » At the same time, this state moralism has a tendency to make critical thinking impossible. It is no longer a question of prompting choices, but of triggering reflexes (Martin Steffens). The state becomes more authoritarian in the private world than in the public one (Hannah Arendt).

Recent events in America suggest that we will have to face a worldwide cultural offensive driven by the United States, and that President Biden himself will accompany this, lest he be unable to control it. This cultural offensive aims to destroy the load-bearing walls of European civilisation, in particular its vision of the dignity of the human being. The response to this offensive, calls for a united effort on behalf of all those who defend life. This effort also requires us to strengthen our commitment to create work that can nourish and build a cultural alternative.